<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Policy News - Sightline Daily</title>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright Sightline Daily - all rights reserved</copyright>
        <managingEditor>newsfeeds@sightline.org</managingEditor>
        <webMaster>newsfeeds@sightline.org</webMaster>
        <description>Most recent Policy headlines from Sightline Daily, the Northwest news that matters</description>
        <link>http://daily.sightline.org</link>
        <generator>Plone</generator>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Views: Vital Signs for National Health Insurance </title>
                <description>Searing headlines about local job cuts sharpen interest in universal health-insurance coverage. The topic grabs the attention of those vulnerable families and voters broadly defined as the middle class, the engine of change. Increasingly, the focus is on national single-payer health insurance. Acceptance of the concept is growing, especially among a key constituency: doctors.</description>
                <link>http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2008098461_lance08.html</link>
                <category>Economy</category>
                <category>Human Health</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>United States</category>
                <pubDate>08/08/2008</pubDate>
                <source>Seattle Times</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Timothy Egan: Nanny Nation</title>
                <description>At a time when so many people are losing homes and jobs, and making tough decisions about whether to fill a gas tank or pay health insurance, city governments should avoid counting calories and dispatching garbage police.

Government should empower us, to use the word so favored by activists. Make sure our food is safe. When products kill, make companies pay. Show us the way to a cleaner garbage stream. Lead by example. </description>
                <link>http://egan.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/06/nanny-nation/?ex=1218859200&amp;en=5ec1035f25ee8b20&amp;ei=5070&amp;emc=eta1</link>
                <category>Economy</category>
                <category>Environment</category>
                <category>Human Health</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>Solutions</category>
                <category>US Northwest</category>
                <pubDate>08/08/2008</pubDate>
                <source>New York Times</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Wyden Bill Takes Aim at Oil, Natural Gas Speculators </title>
                <description>Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., wants to rein in oil prices by requiring speculators to pay regular income tax on their profits. Speculators now pay the capital gains tax on profits from their investments, which is far lower than the regular income tax paid by commercial purchasers of oil commodities - such as airlines. </description>
                <link>http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/1218165917122730.xml&amp;coll=7</link>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>United States</category>
                <pubDate>08/08/2008</pubDate>
                <source>Portland Oregonian</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Views: Republican Energy Fumble</title>
                <description>Politics has its puzzling moments. John McCain and most of the GOP experienced one late last week. That was when five of their own set about dismantling the best issue Republicans have in the upcoming election. It's taken time, but Sen. McCain and his party have finally found - in energy - an issue that's working for them.</description>
                <link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121815293390922431.html?mod=todays_columnists</link>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>United States</category>
                <pubDate>08/08/2008</pubDate>
                <source>Wall Street Journal</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Views: What's So Bad About Foreign Oil? </title>
                <description>There are many things I want independence from - incoming e-mail, the section of my wedding vows about monogamy, this bogus corporation I created to lower my taxes but now takes up all of my time, Sam Zell - but foreign oil is not one of them. Foreign oil is my favorite kind of oil. It means other nations clog their beaches with ugly rigs, do dangerous work and suffer environmental disasters and I still get to cruise Sunset Boulevard in my yellow Mini Cooper convertible. </description>
                <link>http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-stein8-2008aug08,0,3426468.column</link>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>California</category>
                <category>United States</category>
                <pubDate>08/08/2008</pubDate>
                <source>Los Angeles Times</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Climate Team Urges BC to Step up Carbon Tax</title>
                <description>The British Columbia government should consider increasing and expanding its carbon tax if necessary to stay on track with an aggressive target for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, a provincial cabinet advisory group recommended yesterday.</description>
                <link>http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=c175b233-68ff-45bf-b42c-21b0dab48b55</link>
                <category>Cap and Trade</category>
                <category>Economy</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>Pollution &amp; Toxics</category>
                <category>British Columbia</category>
                <pubDate>08/07/2008</pubDate>
                <source>Victoria Times Colonist</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Experts Comment on the Candidates' Energy Policies</title>
                <description>Depending on their own point of view, a panel of experts give thumbs up – or down – to Sens. Obama's and McCain's energy proposals.</description>
                <link>http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0806/p12s01-usec.html</link>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>Solutions</category>
                <category>United States</category>
                <pubDate>08/06/2008</pubDate>
                <source>Christian Science Monitor</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Presidential Energy Pledges: We've Heard Them Before</title>
                <description>In 1973, the world economy was thrown into a recession after the Arab OPEC nations cut off oil supplies to nations that supported Israel. Two years later, President Gerald Ford promised the nation that he had a plan to make the nation "invulnerable" to cutoffs of foreign oil. "It will require sacrifice, but – and this is most important – it will work." Sound familiar?</description>
                <link>http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0806/p11s01-usec.html</link>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>United States</category>
                <pubDate>08/06/2008</pubDate>
                <source>Christian Science Monitor</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Views: Too Much Misleading on Energy Sources</title>
                <description>You could write the formula with mathematical precision. The higher the price of oil and the lower the number of days until the election, the shriller the rhetoric, the grander the promises and the dumber the policy.</description>
                <link>http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/373837_marcus07.html</link>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>United States</category>
                <pubDate>08/07/2008</pubDate>
                <source>Seattle Post-Intelligencer</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
