<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Energy News - Sightline Daily</title>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright Sightline Daily - all rights reserved</copyright>
        <managingEditor>newsfeeds@sightline.org</managingEditor>
        <webMaster>newsfeeds@sightline.org</webMaster>
        <description>Most recent Energy headlines from Sightline Daily, the Northwest news that matters</description>
        <link>http://daily.sightline.org</link>
        <generator>Plone</generator>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Ready to jump off the grid?</title>
                <description>Researchers believe the day is coming when the electricity you use will be your own. Instead of relying on large central generating stations - hydroelectric dams, coal plants and the like - scientists say we're moving toward an era of "personalized solar energy." </description>
                <link>http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2009/11/personalized_solar_units_could.html</link>
                <category>Climate</category>
                <category>Economy</category>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Environment</category>
                <category>Solutions</category>
                <category>Sustainable Living</category>
                <category>Oregon</category>
                <category>United States</category>
                <pubDate>11/05/2009</pubDate>
                <source>Oregonian</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Climate change: Threat or opportunity?</title>
                <description>A curious debate has broken out among American environmental groups, as the Senate balkily starts to focus on the threat of climate change. Is this really the time to talk about shrinking glaciers?</description>
                <link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/05/AR2009110502134.html</link>
                <category>Cap and Trade</category>
                <category>Climate</category>
                <category>Economy</category>
                <category>Efficiency</category>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Environment</category>
                <category>Green Jobs</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>Pollution &amp; Toxics</category>
                <category>United States</category>
                <pubDate>11/06/2009</pubDate>
                <source>Washington Post</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Democrats push climate bill without GOP </title>
                <description>Democrats on the Environment and Public Works Committee pushed through a climate bill on Thursday without any debate or participation by Republicans. The move suggests that President Obama and bill supporters will have serious problems assembling the votes needed to enact it when it comes to the Senate floor, probably not before next year.</description>
                <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/06/us/politics/06climate.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss</link>
                <category>Cap and Trade</category>
                <category>Climate</category>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Environment</category>
                <category>Food &amp; Farms</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>Pollution &amp; Toxics</category>
                <category>United States</category>
                <pubDate>11/05/2009</pubDate>
                <source>New York Times</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Views: Scientist stakes reputation on salmon plan</title>
                <description>The Obama administration and the region’s federal dam managers are pinning their hopes to the scientific reputation of Jane Lubchenco, administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and a marine ecologist from Oregon State University. And it’s a good call. 

</description>
                <link>http://voices.idahostatesman.com/2009/11/05/rockybarker/scientist_courtroom</link>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Environment</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>Salmon</category>
                <category>Water</category>
                <category>US Northwest</category>
                <pubDate>11/05/2009</pubDate>
                <source>Idaho Statesman</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Baucus votes against climate change bill</title>
                <description>Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., was the only Democrat on Thursday to vote against a climate change bill that Democrats rammed through a Senate committee - but said he still supports the effort to limit greenhouse gases and pass a bill.</description>
                <link>http://www.missoulian.com/news/local/article_ac65255c-ca99-11de-847e-001cc4c03286.html</link>
                <category>Cap and Trade</category>
                <category>Climate</category>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Environment</category>
                <category>Policy</category>
                <category>Pollution &amp; Toxics</category>
                <category>Montana</category>
                <category>United States</category>
                <pubDate>11/06/2009</pubDate>
                <source>Missoulian</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Views: Energy initiative should spark broader dialogue </title>
                <description>Promoting clean energy development in the Mid-Columbia region is a natural fit, but we need a broader conversation about our economic future. That includes serious talks about potential uses of those parts of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation that are cleaned up and no longer are needed by the federal government.

</description>
                <link>http://www.tri-cityherald.com/opinions/story/782478.html</link>
                <category>Economy</category>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Environment</category>
                <category>Pollution &amp; Toxics</category>
                <category>Washington</category>
                <pubDate>11/06/2009</pubDate>
                <source>Tri-City Herald</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>BC has enough power for millions of electric cars</title>
                <description>There's enough under-used capacity in British Columbia's power grid to charge 2.5 million electric vehicles, almost the number of vehicles on BC roads right now, a new study suggests.</description>
                <link>http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2009/11/03/bc-electric-vehicle-study.html</link>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Sprawl &amp; Transportation</category>
                <category>British Columbia</category>
                <pubDate>11/04/2009</pubDate>
                <source>CBC BC</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Most common Clunkers deal: Old pickup for new pickup</title>
                <description>The most common deals under the US $3 billion Cash for Clunkers program replaced old Ford or Chevrolet pickups with new ones that got only marginally better gas mileage. </description>
                <link>http://www.contracostatimes.com/business/ci_13712112?source=rss&amp;nclick_check=1</link>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>United States</category>
                <pubDate>11/05/2009</pubDate>
                <source>Contra Costa Times</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
        
            <item>
                <title>Portland gets $5.6 million for energy retrofits</title>
                <description>Portland is getting $5.6 million in federal stimulus dollars for energy efficiency projects including upgrading traffic and pedestrian signals and paying for residential energy efficiency loans.
</description>
                <link>http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2009/11/portland_gets_56_million_from.html</link>
                <category>Efficiency</category>
                <category>Energy</category>
                <category>Oregon</category>
                <pubDate>11/04/2009</pubDate>
                <source>Oregonian</source> <!-- XXX add tal:attributes for url -->
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
