Sightline Project

Northwest Coal Exports

Photo courtesy of Paul K Anderson. Used with permission.

Coal companies want to open up Pacific Northwest ports so that they can supply American coal to Asia. Current plans call for shipping more than 100 million tons of coal each year, roughly 20 times as much as Washington’s lone coal plant burns. There are serious global consequences to burning this much coal. Meanwhile, Northwest communities along railways and near the ports are worried about coal’s damage to their health and quality of life. Sightline’s series examines the coal export proposals in depth, fact-checks the arguments in favor of new terminals, and crunches the numbers on everything from railway congestion to carbon emissions. (Photo by Paul K Anderson, used with permission.)

Posts on Northwest Coal Exports

Industry Pollution Expert Calls for Comprehensive Review of Coal Transport Along Railways

Toxicologist statement is huge blow to coal export backers.

Kinder Morgan’s Coal Export Scheme Bites the Dust

Company abandons coal terminal planned for Oregon.

Recent Coal Export Trends: Q4 2012

Exports fall nationally, rise in the West.

The Northern Cheyenne Weigh In On Coal Exports

Tribes speak out on Otter Creek Mine.

Coal Exports: Two Weeks of Good News

Bad news for coal exports, good news for everyone else.

The Reality of Coal Jobs, Canadian Edition

Fossil fuel spending produces little employment.

How Coal Affects Water Quality: State of the Science

What we know about the impacts of coal handling on waterways.

Look Who’s Taking Coal Money: Seattle Times Investigates

Front page coverage of Sightline's research.

No, the Coal Will Not Just Go to Canada (episode 9,274)

The coal industry itself says it desperately needs new terminals.

Ambre’s Shaky Finances: Rebutting the Response

Gard Communications, the coal startup's PR firm, critiques a report it apparently hadn't read.