Northwest Coal Exports
Photo courtesy of Paul K Anderson. Used with permission.
Coal companies want to open up Pacific Northwest ports so that they can supply American coal to Asia. Current plans call for shipping more than 100 million tons of coal each year, roughly 20 times as much as Washington’s lone coal plant burns. There are serious global consequences to burning this much coal. Meanwhile, Northwest communities along railways and near the ports are worried about coal’s damage to their health and quality of life. Sightline’s series examines the coal export proposals in depth, fact-checks the arguments in favor of new terminals, and crunches the numbers on everything from railway congestion to carbon emissions. (Photo by Paul K Anderson, used with permission.)
Posts on Northwest Coal Exports
Tony Williams and Jeff Bjornstad paid to promote coal exports.
Controversial hire raises questions about coal export plans in Washington.
Coal prices have collapsed...leaving Northwest export projects hanging by a thread.
Free public lectures on the Northwest's changing energy economy.
Despite obvious ongoing pollution, coal handlers want to expand.
Exports slightly down on the West Coast and nationally.
The Northwest faces off against titanic coal and oil export schemes.
ForestEthics' new report on the Northwest fossil fuel blow-up.
A carbon comparison of Northwest coal plans and a huge tar sands pipeline.
What an internal industry dispute says about coal dust risk.