New York Times
05/11/2009
Will the Obama administration's apparent achievement in arresting an economic free fall yield a sustainable revival, creating millions of jobs? Or will federal spending amount to a pinata at a children's birthday party, with the proceeds scattered willy-nilly? In Boise, Idaho, the local economy presents a microcosm of the recent American experience, making it a useful laboratory to seek those answers.
Go to article.
Oregon Public Broadcasting
05/10/2009
Oregon's carbon footprint would shrink under a bill narrowly approved by the Oregon House. The measure would affect everything from the fuel you buy to the tires you drive on, but the centerpiece of the legislation is a section that requires a 10 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicle fuel.
Go to article.
Everett Herald
05/10/2009
The Snohomish County PUD wants to construct miniature dams - "micro hydro" in industry jargon - in the upper reaches of streams and creeks, above already existing natural barriers to salmon and other migratory fish. But some conservation groups who worry they could still harm the environment call it greenwashing for the hydropower industry.
Go to article.
Toronto Globe and Mail
05/10/2009
Canadians are willing to flirt with a nationwide carbon tax to fight climate change, but bets are off when it comes to paying the bill, a new poll has found. Support for the tax was lowest in BC, the only province that actually has one.
Go to article.
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
05/11/2009
Counties suffering the most from job losses stand to receive the least help from President Barack Obama's plan to spend billions of stimulus dollars on roads and bridges, an AP analysis has found. Although the intent of the money is to put people back to work, many struggling communities lack projects waiting on a shelf and can't afford millions for required plans.
Go to article.
Eugene Register Guard
05/10/2009
The Obama administration has decided to keep a Bush-era policy that limits protection of the polar bear from global warming. The disappointing decision means the government cannot use the federal Endangered Species Act to reduce greenhouse emissions.
Go to article.