Special Series
Seattle's Great Viaduct Debate
As Seattle moves forward with a deep-bore tunnel to replace the Alaskan Way Viaduct, Sightline examines the issue of potential cost overruns. The state legislature has made it clear it wants Seattle property owners on the hook--but the cost could be enormous. Read Sightline's collection of posts on replacing the viaduct and what it means for Seattle residents.
Sign up for weekly updates to posts on the Viaduct and other hot topics (check "best of the Daily Score blog").
Series Posts
Sort by: Oldest | Most Recent
WashDOT Says: 40% Chance of Tunnel Cost Overruns
07/19/2010 With odds like that, we should figure out who pays before any work starts.
What Could Go Wrong With The Tunnel
07/08/2010 The best reporting yet on the threat of cost overruns.
The Tunnel Won't Be Boring III
07/07/2010 Brightwater tunnel cost overruns could top $200 million.
The Road That's Paid With Good Intentions
04/08/2010 State says Seattle's on the hook for tunnel cost overruns.
The Bored Tunnel's $60 Million Cost Increase
02/04/2010 A 3 percent overrun on an expensive project could be pricey.
Will Our Costs Runneth Over?
01/06/2010 Looking backward (and forward) at the cost of Seattle's viaduct replacement.
Wishful Thinking About Tunnel Costs
12/23/2009 Cascadia Center repeats misinformation about actual cost overruns.
Deep Bore: Is Seattle On The Hook For Cost Overruns?
10/19/2009 Rep. Clibborn adds to the uncertainty about tunnel finances.
Cost Overruns For Seattle-area Tunnel Projects
10/16/2009 A new Sightline report documents the costs of tunnels.
