Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

The Daily Score


Special Series

Best of the Daily Score

40

In a Series

Leave it to Beavers

Posted by John Abbotts and Clark Williams-Derry
A furry solution to summertime water shortages?

State officials expect that climate change will create some profound water supply problems in eastern Washington.  But there’s a potential solution that’s not only cheap, but also cute and furry: beavers.

Here’s the problem:  according to climate scientists, warmer temperatures are already melting mountain snows earlier in the spring.  That leaves streams and rivers short on water in mid-summer, just when salmon, farms, and homes really need it.  Scientists expect that, as winter temperatures in the Northwest rise, the state's summertime water shortages will only get worse.  (The preamble in this state Executive Order has a nice, succinct rundown of the impacts of climate change that the state has already experienced.)

To start dealing with the state's slow-moving water crisis, Governor Gregoire asked the state ecology department to find ways to store more spring runoff.  And, perhaps predictably, the department came back with some big, costly, and capital-intensive ideas:   dams on Hawk Creek (pictured), Sand Hollow, and Crab Creek, three canyon tributaries to the Columbia River.  Under the proposal, the state could pump spring snowmelt into reservoirs behind the dams, releasing it in mid-summer. 

That might sound pretty reasonable, except for a few niggling details – like that fact that the dams would likely cost Washington taxpayers billions of dollars, while flooding thousands of acres of farmland and wildlife habitat. 

The Lands Council, a Spokane based non-profit, thinks that it has a better idea:  enhance beaver populations, and let the furry wonders do the dam construction for free!

Beaver - flickr user herseydc (steve)Beavers once numbered in the millions in Washington State, before hunters nearly wiped them out for their pelts.  Today, the state’s beaver population has grown to about 400,000—a welcome rebound, but still just a fraction of their original abundance.  And since each beaver dam can hold three to four acre-feet of water, the Lands Council estimates that about a half-million new or relocated beavers could build enough small dams to store as much water as the big concrete behemoths -- without all of the expensive construction.

Now, I have no idea if the Lands Council is right.  But if the choice is between a trio of concrete dams that will cost billions, and a scoping grant for restoring beaver populations, I’ll side with the beavers any day.  The Department of Ecology recently awarded the Lands Council a grant to assist with research, working with landowners, and investigating the economic potential for water banking and conservation easements.  And the council is hosting a Working Beavers forum at the end of the month to explore the idea further – see here for more information.

Of course, the chance to restore beaver populations doesn't take away the sting of climate change.  Still, there's a bit of comfort in realizing that, every once in a while, there's a solution to a complex human problem that's also a boon for nature.

The first draft of this post was prepared by John Abbotts, a long-time friend of Sightline.  Beaver picture courtesy of Flickr user sherseydc (steve).



Comments
Posted by Naturally Interesting 03/05/2009 05:43 PM
How exactly does one go about capturing and importing 500,000 beavers? I'm envisioning something along the lines of Operation Dumbo Drop, but on a much larger scale.
Posted by heidi 03/06/2009 07:26 AM
I realize naturally interesting is in jest, but dropping beavers by parachute was actually tried in oregon. I don't recommend it. Read Eric Collier's book "Three against the wilderness" to learn about introduced species effect on the habitat. Thanks for the great article.

Heidi Perryman
President & Founder
Worth a Dam
www.martinezbeavers.org
Posted by Brian 03/06/2009 09:17 AM
As the Watershed Program Director for The Lands Council and manager of this grant, I can assure you that we have no intent of parachuting beavers into the wilds of Washington. In our work, we have already been working with several agencies in Washington that currently live trap beavers. Their problem is that it can be difficult to locate suitable locations to release these beavers where human conflict won’t crop up again in the near future. Through our efforts, we plan to work with state agencies and private landowners to locate several hundred thousand locations that these trapped beaver can be readily moved to where they will be well away from roads and culverts that probably got them trapped in the first place. Along with the water storage potential, we are also keeping an eye on the potential for wetland restoration, sediment retention and other benefits that beaver ponds can provide.
Posted by Clark Williams-Derry 03/06/2009 10:45 AM
PleasePleasePLEASE start parachuting a half million beavers into eastern Washington as soon as possible!!! And I want to see it on Youtube!!!
Posted by shira 03/06/2009 12:16 PM
Go for it Brian! Beavers are the capstone species that make upland wetlands wet land and not just an eroded water slide. The other thing that we need is more trees allowed to wash downstream and do what they do, get hung up and provide nursery habitat. Eventually the trees end up in the Sound, where they provide more invaluable habitat and hazards to navigation, hence the anti-tree attitude.
Posted by Dave 03/06/2009 12:39 PM
I can vouch for Brian with regard to the difficulty of finding suitable locations for re-locating beavers. At a wildlife refuge near my home, beavers were continually damming a water control structure, causing flooding into neighboring private land, and other problems. The refuge manager tried very hard to find some agency who could remove the beavers, but they all said that there was no suitable place, "any place that would be good for beavers already has beavers", and that killing them was the only option.
Posted by Joye Redfield 03/06/2009 12:54 PM
I'd like to point out that the state of Washington has provided a $30,000 grant to the Lands Council to study the feasibility of this project. Large story is NOT the primary investment being made by the Department of Ecology. In 2008, $46 million was designated for projects designed to develop additonal water supplies in Eastern Washington, ranging from conservation projects, infrastructure upgrades, aquifer storage, ditch linings, pipings, pump exchanges etc. The goal is to make more water available to enhance stream flows for fish and to support new out-of-stream uses.

Posted by Jay Coleman 03/07/2009 08:12 AM
The need to balance a person's ownership of land with the larger context of the community's need for water via a simple solution? Beavers do need a habitat and are cheap builders. As an interested fisher person in the western mountains, I noticed the nice level fields/meadows left behind after the beaver's pond had filled in with sediment. Of course, they had moved on to other areas to build new dams. In other words, beavers build temporary structures if you look over a longer time span. Maybe we should be looking at this, as a community, to view an individual's current land "right" with the community's need for water and compensate the landowner by renting the land for the beaver's use(and henceforth the community's use) while suspending the taxing of that land, unless the landowner wished to use the land in the condition the beaver "modified" it? The land would then be taxed at a lesser rate if the owner chose to still occupy it.
However, it should be noted, not all beavers are supreme builders and we, as a community should remember this and always keep an eye on what's downstream. Be that as it may, it is still a better option to have built many smaller holding ponds than larger dams.
Posted by Bob Vadas, Jr. 03/10/2009 01:10 PM
One doesn't need to put in tons of beavers to get them to recolonize historic habitats; they reproduce just fine on their own, thank you. Their ability to modulate flows and restock streams with large-woody debris can definitely benefit fishes, as long as instream flows aren’t depleted further to cause water-quality and/or fish-blockage impacts. Here's some more relevant web sites:

http://www.beaverdam.info
www.nwcouncil.org/news/2008/03/3.pdf
http://www.hww.ca/hww2.asp?pid=1=82=8
http://www.landscouncil.org/water/what_can_beavers_do.asp

Posted by Matt the Engineer 06/03/2009 10:54 AM
Is this a good sign (beaver populations increasing enough to notice them) or a bad sign (yet another suburban development forces beaver to relocate to the urban environment)?

http://www.myballard.com/2009/06/03/what-is-this-strange-animal/

Add a Comment

Name (required)
Email (will not be published) (required)
Website
See a list of html tags you can use in your comment.
(required)
This check is used to prevent comments by spammers.


Sightline Daily brought to you by Sightline Institute.

ORGANIZATION'S NAME GOES HERE!!! It will be hidden by CSS; we need it only for hCard compliance.
1402 Third Avenue, Suite 500 | Seattle, Washington 98101 | tel: +1.206.447.1880 | fax: +1.206.447.2270