Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

The Daily Score


Special Series

Bicycle Neglect

12

In a Series

Cyc-lingo

Posted by Alan Durning
Bicycle Neglect, defined.

Some unfinished business: I’ve been thinking and writing about Bicycle Neglect now for half a year, and I still have not defined the term—an oversight that I’ll rectify right away.

Bicycle Neglect is a syndrome with four mutually reinforcing symptoms:

  1. A tendency to view bicycles as a form of recreation, not a form of transportation (this is typically a manifestation of Car-head);
  2. An institutional, legal, and physical environment explicitly or unwittingly hostile to bicycling for transportation (typical features include car-oriented traffic laws, car-oriented traffic policing, woefully inadequate biking facilities, and miserly budgets to improve these facilities);
  3. Unnecessarily dangerous conditions for cycling; and
  4. Very low levels of bicycling for transportation, as a result.

 

Bicycle Respect is Bicycle Neglect’s opposite, on each count:

 

  1. A tendency to view bicycles as a form of transportation, not just recreation;
  2. An institutional, legal, and physical environment supportive of bicycling for transportation, including bike-friendly traffic laws and policing, ample biking facilities, and adequate budgets to improve these facilities;
  3. Safe conditions for cycling; and
  4. High levels of bicycling for transportation, as a result.

 

Nothing more to say here: this series just needed a glossary.



Comments
Posted by Sea 11/19/2007 02:56 PM
I would include some of the thing that happen whenever bicycle improvements are proposed. 1) Fear of loosing parking spots. (As if parking is a best use for a public right of way.) 2) Fear of attracting bad element to the area. 3) That bicyclist are considered a bad element. 4)Fear that property values will go down. (They always go up.) 5) Something I don't understand, an almost insane hate for bicyclist by the people opposed to bicycle improvements.
Posted by Aaron Antrim of Green Wheels 11/23/2007 09:27 PM
I'd like to add another symptom of bicycle neglect. In my area (Humboldt County), when traffic is studied, volumes are measured for automobiles, but not for cyclists, and traffic safety is considered in terms of motor vehicle accidents but not for cyclists and pedestrians. A related, but different, issue is that reducing (automobile) vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is not considered as a strategy for improving safety. One would expect that fewer vehicle miles driven would result in fewer accidents. Instead, traffic engineers usually focus exclusively on reducing accidents per vehicle mile traveled. This is an important focus, but should not be exclusive.

Add a Comment

Name (required)
Email (will not be published) (required)
Website
See a list of html tags you can use in your comment.
(required)
This check is used to prevent comments by spammers.


Sightline Daily brought to you by Sightline Institute.

ORGANIZATION'S NAME GOES HERE!!! It will be hidden by CSS; we need it only for hCard compliance.
1402 Third Avenue, Suite 500 | Seattle, Washington 98101 | tel: +1.206.447.1880 | fax: +1.206.447.2270