Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

The Daily Score


Climate Made the Difference

Posted by Clark Williams-Derry
Like never before, voters see the transportation-climate connection.

Sure, you can't always trust exit polls.  But this is interesting:  a Washington, DC polling firm contracted by the Sierra Club just released an analysis (pdf link) of voting patterns on Puget Sound's Roads and Transit ballot measure.  And the poll confirms what we've argued several times now:  global warming is starting to play a key role in the region's transportation debates.

In a nutshell: Proposition 1 fell by a vote of 55 percent to 45 percent -- meaning that about 5 percent of the voters would have had to change their minds in order for the measure to pass.

Traffic-jam-smog-140wAnd in this exit poll, nearly one-fifth of the "no" votes -- or about 10 percent of all voters -- cited concerns over climate disruption as their top reason for opposing the package.  Diving a bit deeper into the data, there was a sizable bloc of voters -- perhaps just enough to tip the electoral scales -- who supported transit, but were concerned enough about the climate impacts of new roads that they opposed the measure as a whole.

Obviously, polling data are squishy, and the finer you split the responses the less accurate they become.  That said, the climate-transportation link really seems to have sunk in:  apparently, there's now a critical mass of voters who see climate and transportation as joined at the hip -- and are letting climate concerns guide their votes.

And regardless of how you feel about light rail's fate, voters' growing awareness of the link between climate and transportation is something to feel good about.



Comments
Posted by Clark Williams-Derry 11/08/2007 04:17 PM
PS - The other interesting news in this poll: voters prefer tolls to taxes; and a transit-only package might have passed, while it looks as if a road-only package would have failed.
Posted by a-kos 11/08/2007 06:53 PM
That's certainly good news, but the probable and unfortuante political reality is that any comprehensive transportation measure is going to have to include at least something that appeals to regular drivers (roads, etc).

I suspect the next transportation ballot measure will be similar to Prop 1, but with more emphasis on public transit (PT), but still something for roads. While I'd like to see PT as the entire focus with little or no new roads (except transit only), I don't think that's politically realistic.
Posted by Morgan Ahouse 11/08/2007 10:35 PM
There's a bit more slicing and dicing of the results.


The report also confirms that guys dislike taxes more, care less about regressivity and like roads more.

Add a Comment

Name (required)
Email (will not be published) (required)
Website
See a list of html tags you can use in your comment.
(required)
This check is used to prevent comments by spammers.


Sightline Daily brought to you by Sightline Institute.

ORGANIZATION'S NAME GOES HERE!!! It will be hidden by CSS; we need it only for hCard compliance.
1402 Third Avenue, Suite 500 | Seattle, Washington 98101 | tel: +1.206.447.1880 | fax: +1.206.447.2270