Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Daily Score Blog



Beautiful Article

Posted by Eric de Place
What nature means to the city

It's an article by Tom Reese in yesterday's Pacific Northwest Magazine about the Lake Washington wetlands near Seattle's Arboretum. I actually found myself strangely upset by the article. Not only because he's describing a place I've loved for years, but because he so carefully describes the contingency of the natural environment there.

Reese takes the pied-billed grebe as his touchstone, which is a good choice. If you know where to look, you can find the grebe's nest resting on the lily pads. It's exposed. It trusts to camoflauge to avoid disturbance. And the grebes there always make me worry because they're so small and tentative, with so little to defend themselves. They're the perfect metaphor for our stewardship of the natural refuges in our cities.

Plus, the seventeen photos that accompany the article online are also astonishingly good. Much better than ordinary newspaper shots. But you should go see for yourself.



Congestion: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease?

Posted by Clark Williams-Derry
Relieving congestion can increase other costs of driving.

The ever-geekalicious Todd Litman of the Victoria Transport Policy Institute had a great take on traffic congestion a few weeks back on Planetizen.

As Litman explains, most congestion studies (such as this annual study, which always gets a lot of press) consistently overestimate the costs of congestion. But even using these relatively high estimates, the costs of congestion are pretty modest, compared with the comprehensive costs of owning and operating a car.

Congestion costs vs. all other driving costs - 244 In fact, a quick scan of Litman's data suggests that congestion represents less than 5 percent of the total cost of car transportation. (In the chart to the left, the "All other costs" bar includes car payments, parking, gas, insurance, crash costs, air pollution, road building, road maintenance, and the rental value of land occupied by roads, among other factors.)

Of course, some congestion "solutions" actually increase other costs of driving. Building lanes, for example, is costly in itself. Plus, more lanes means more total traffic on the region's roads, which can simultaneously a) increase congestion elsewhere in the road system, b) increase overall parking costs, c) increase crash and pollution costs. Taking all costs into account, "curing" congestion by expanding capacity can be more expensive than the disease itself. And as the graph shows, you don't have to increase the other costs by much, in percentage terms, before the extra costs overwhelm the modest, temporary benefits of congestion relief.

More...


 

Sightline Daily brought to you by Sightline Institute.

ORGANIZATION'S NAME GOES HERE!!! It will be hidden by CSS; we need it only for hCard compliance.
1402 Third Avenue, Suite 500 | Seattle, Washington 98101 | tel: +1.206.447.1880 | fax: +1.206.447.2270