Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

The Daily Score


Cutting Jobs

Posted by Eric de Place
Efficiency, not endangered species, hurts timber employment.

Cutting more trees does not mean creating more jobs. That's a point this blog has made at least a couple of times. And it's the same point made today in an opinion piece in the Eugene Register-Guard. Automation, not spotted owls, decimated the Northwest's forest jobs. By the same token, weakening the Endangered Species Act and opening up roadless areas for logging will not herald a new era of timber employment.

Here's the crux of the article:

In 1979, it took 4.5 workers to mill 1 million board feet of lumber. By 1989, it took just two workers to mill the same 1 million board feet.

Economists called it increased efficiency. Mill owners called it increased productivity. Millworkers called it unemployment. Merchants in mill towns called it bankruptcy.



Comments
There are no comments yet.

Add a Comment

Name (required)
Email (will not be published) (required)
Website
See a list of html tags you can use in your comment.
(required)
This check is used to prevent comments by spammers.


Sightline Daily brought to you by Sightline Institute.

ORGANIZATION'S NAME GOES HERE!!! It will be hidden by CSS; we need it only for hCard compliance.
1402 Third Avenue, Suite 500 | Seattle, Washington 98101 | tel: +1.206.447.1880 | fax: +1.206.447.2270