Paul Krugman weighs in with an argument for auctioned cap and trade ASAP: legal emissions limits can be a macroeconomic stimulus.
-
Subscribe
Stay up to date on the Northwest's most important sustainability issues.
Manage your subscriptions. -
Stay Connected
-
Thanks to:
The Dankers Family
for supporting a sustainable Northwest. -
Popular Posts
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Judi on Where Are the Women Bike Commuters?
- Not Fan on Where Are the Women Bike Commuters?
- Not Fan on For Climate, Place Matters
- Not Fan on For Climate, Place Matters
- Eric de Place on Making Sustainability Savory
-
Blog Topics
Series
- Best of Sightline's blog
- Dude, Where Are My Cars?
- Sustainababy: Born to be Green
- Talking Weather and Climate
- Weekend Reading
- What's New is Old
Current Work
- Cascadian Demographics
- Making Sustainability Legal
- Northwest Coal Exports
- Northwest Ocean Acidification
- Stormwater Solutions: Curbing Toxic Runoff
- The Dirt on Coal
- Word on the Street
Issue Areas
Regions




Michelle says:
Alan, thanks for the good *tuba blast* of info to call our attention to Krugman’s thoughtful article!
Reading his analysis more carefully, though, it might be appropriate to add some violin melody to fill in the gaps, lest we fall under a potential sub-category of what he calls “junk economics.”
He definitely stresses that NOW is the time for Congress to “mandate gradually tightening emission limits” that would start “two or three years from now.”
This GRADUAL implementation would give businesses a reasonable amount of time “to invest in new equipment and facilities…” This in turn, would lessen the economic impact on the consumer’s pocketbook, since they/we are the one’s who will ultimately foot the bill for cleaning up the environmental messes the businesses make.
Let’s get started!
</melody>